Scientific scholarly communication is subject to selection rules. In recent years, the issues around the assessment of research results has assumed a central role in academia. Despite recent efforts, by several initiatives both at national and international level, and the adoption of guidelines that emerged from the evaluation of research programs at European level, the measurement and evaluation of the quality of research still faces strong opposition from all bibliometric areas, in which the i
Source: journals.cambridge.org
Ginevra Peruginelli (2015). Evaluating Research: the Case of Legal Scholarly Outputs. Legal Information Management, 15, pp 50-56. doi:10.1017/S147266961500016X.
